Peter J. Buzynski v. Richard M. Oliver, Warden, Maine State Prison
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state from requiring a criminal defendant, who pleads legal insanity, to carry the burden of persuasion on that issue. Maine is one of a substantial number of states which require a criminal defendant who raises the defense of legal insanity not only to produce evidence on that issue 1 but also to persuade the jury of his insanity by a preponderance of the evidence. In the instant case, defendant failed to satisfy this burden. In the first stage of his bifurcated trial,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Girouard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In re Saco Local Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Alan S. Kostka v. David W. HoggCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Martha Olson v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Sammie Blankenship v. Secretary of Hew and the Department of HewCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.