Legal Opinion

People v. Steenstra-Toussaint

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.

The defendant Merz applies ‘ ‘ for an order to suppress evidence, conversations and confessions upon which the indictment herein was found, on the grounds that said evidence, conversations and confessions were obtained by and is the product of an unlawful search and seizure, in violation of the defendant’s rights as guaranteed by the 4th, 6th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution, New York State Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 6 and in violation of Sections 551a and 1844 of the Penal Law, and Sections 8, 188, 190, 308 and 699 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and Civil Rights Law,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Cicenia v. LagaySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. People v. LoganNew York Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DubardNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. Gerber, New York County Courts1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API