Legal Opinion

People v. Dubard

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDominic S. Rinaldi, J.

The defendant seeks to suppress admissions and a confession which are obviously barred by the Miranda decision (384 U. S. 436) and other related cases concerning confessions. However, he has not been served with notice by the District Attorney under section 813-f of the Code of Criminal Procedure of an intention to offer a confession or statement at his trial. The District Attorney therefore opposes the motion not only on the ground that it is premature and not in line with the procedures of that section, but that in any event, the motion to suppress cannot lie under section 813-c of the code…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. Steenstra-ToussaintNew York Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Nero, New York County Courts1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API