In re Kenneth Barber, Jr., Theodore C. Smith, Jr., Danielle M. Rousseau, John Burke
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtEaton, J.
*368 ¶ 1. This case raises the question of whether this Court's decision in In re Bridger , 2017 VT 79 , --- Vt. ----, 176 A.3d 489 , regarding the requirements of Vermont Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(f) is retroactive to cases already final on direct review. We conclude that Bridger announced a new criminal procedural rule and that the new rule does not apply to cases where direct review was concluded at the time Bridger was decided. Thus, in those cases, pending or future collateral proceedings must be evaluated under pre- Bridger standards. Under the then-existing standard, we affirm the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re John GrismoreSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- The Bank of New York Mellon v. Daniel T. QuinnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- State v. Jason RobertsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- State v. Kent EatonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026
- Barney v. StateVermont Superior Court · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.