Legal Opinion

Busch v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1967No. 32641PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Commissioner.

The determinative issue in this appeal is whether there was a violation of any legal duty defendant owed plaintiff as a proximate result of which violation plaintiff’s injury occurred. The trial court held there was no such case presented, sustained defendant’s timely after-trial motion for judgment in accordance with its motion for a directed verdict, and set aside the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $6,500.00.

It will be of assistance in understanding the factual situation presented by this appeal to have plaintiff’s pleading, theory, and manner of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marie E. Pogue and William T. Pogue v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Hart v. Emery-Bird-Thayer Dry Goods Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Clymer v. TennisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Supreme Liberty L. Ins. Co. v. PemeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  5. Simpson v. DuffyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kramer v. May Lumber CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Edwards v. Springfield Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Pagano v. Kolbrener, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Melton ex rel. Melton v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API