Legal Opinion
Estate of Himelstein
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 28, 1990No. 88-1667PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
898 F.2d 573
ESTATE OF Rose HIMELSTEIN, Mandel Himelstein and Eugene
Himelstein, Beneficiaries of Land Trust No.
14-03443, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA, Benjamin Eisbart, Mark
Giaquinta, Vivian Schmidt, Sam Talarico and James
Stier, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-1667.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued Sept. 27, 1989.
Decided March 28, 1990.
Mark J. Thompson, Ronald E. James, Benson, Pantello, Morris & James, Fort Wayne, Ind., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Robert L. Thompson, Peebles, Thompson, Rogers & Skekloff, J. Timothy McCaulay, Stanley A. Levine, Levine &…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hood v. Dept. of Wildlife ConservationMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Hager v. City of West PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Wright v. WhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Kellas v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- East Mississippi State Hosp. v. CallensMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.