McKay v. Mad Murphy's, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT CAFAREL-LA’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ARTERTON, District Judge.
I. Introduction
In this trademark action, the parties each claim the right to use the trademark “Mad Murphy” or “Mad Murphy’s,” in connection with their Hartford business ventures. Plaintiffs David McKay and Robert McKay have a partnership which operates the Municipal Cafe, a Hartford restaurant and bar that offers entertainment services under the promotional name of “Mad Murphy Presents.” Defendant Mad Murphy’s Inc. is a corporation that operates “Mad Murphy’s”, a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- David T. Thompson and Thompson Communications Companies, Inc. v. Davor G. GjivojeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pilates, Inc. v. Current Concepts, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Buti v. Impressa Perosa, S.R.L.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- John C. Flood of Virginia, Inc. v. John C. Flood, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In Re: Windstream Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024