Legal Opinion

Geer v. Tonnon

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 9, 2007No. 57798-1-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

f 1 To prevail in a legal professional negligence case, the plaintiff client must demonstrate that the outcome of the underlying litigation for which the representation was provided would have been more favorable to the client than the result actually obtained but for the defendant attorney’s negligence. Charles Geer appeals from the trial court’s ruling granting attorney Alan Tonnon’s motion for summary judgment in Geer’s legal professional negligence action, which was based upon Tonnon’s failure to file suit against an insurer within a one-year contractual limi*841tation period. The trial court…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Boguch v. Landover Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Boguch v. Landover Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Clark County Fire District No. 5 v. Bullivant Houser Bailey PCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. HIPPLE v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Hipple v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API