State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
In this case involving multiple crimes arising from a single criminal episode, the trial court held that, as soon as it pronounced sentence on one of the crimes, that conviction became part of defendant’s criminal history for the purpose of sentencing on the remaining crimes. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in doing so, because the applicable sentencing rule, OAR 253-04-006(2), 1 does not permit the “current crime or crimes of conviction” to be considered part of his criminal history. We agree and remand for resentencing.
On August 12, 1995, defendant ran a red light and collided…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CuevasOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. DulfuOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.