State v. Cuevas
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*149KISTLER, J.
This case involves two sentencing guidelines rules. One rule directs trial courts to count a defendant’s convictions at the time of sentencing in calculating the defendant’s criminal history. OAR 213-004-0006(2). The other rule limits the length of a consecutive sentence that a trial court can impose. OAR 213-012-0020(2). On appeal, the Court of Appeals concluded that both rules increased defendant’s sentence based on facts that, under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), a jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Cuevas, 263 Or App…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. DulfuOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Discipline of Donald GilbertUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. DulfuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. ThornsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.