Legal Opinion

Conkright v. Frommert

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 30, 2009No. 08A884 (08-810)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Ginsburg,

Circuit Justice.

Sally L. Conkright, Administrator of the Xerox Corporation Pension Plan, et al., have reapplied for a stay of the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In their initial application, filed October 16, 2008, the applicants sought a stay pending the filing and disposition of their petition for certiorari. The Second Circuit’s decision in their case, 535 F. 3d 111 (2008), they asserted, was erroneous, created a Circuit conflict, and would cause irreparable harm if given effect. Without a stay, the applicants explained, they would be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. ROSTKER, DIRECTOR OF SELECTIVE SERVICE, Et Al. v. GOLDBERG Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Frommert v. ConkrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Cook County, Illinois v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Frommert v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  4. Barnes v. AhlmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. WILLIAM A. GRAHAM CO. v. HaugheyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API