Smith v. Newell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MARSHALL, District Judge.
This suit is brought in pursuance of an adverse claim filed in the land office under section 2326 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, by the plaintiff, who claims to own the Alta Belle mining claim, against the application of the defendants for a patent for the Dutchman lode. The plaintiff’s claim was located on May 25, 1894; the defendants’, on January 1,1889. It is not contended that the Dutchman lode was abandoned, or subject to forfeiture for failure to do the required annual work thereon; but the right of the plaintiff to recover depends on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
- Upton v. LarkinMontana Supreme Court · 1888
- Pollard v. ShivelySupreme Court of Colorado · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walton v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Scoggin v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- Ranchers Exploration and Development Co. v. Anaconda Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1965
- Nichols v. Ora Tahoma Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1944
- Cardoner v. Stanley Consol. Min. & Mill. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.