Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Lindley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1886No. 12,535PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowie, J.

The first error complained of here by appellant, the defendant below, is the overruling of his demurrer to appellees’ complaint herein.

This suit was commenced in the court below on the 30th day of May, 1884, by one Martha A. Woods as sole plaintiff, against the appellant as sole defendant. In her complaint then filed, Martha A. Woods alleged that she was the owner in fee simple of the undivided one-third of certain parcels of *298■real estate, particularly described, in Hancock county; and that appellant wrongfully, and without any lawful right, detained and kept possession thereof from her, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. KrugIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Patten v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Second National Bank v. CoreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. McCarnan v. CochranIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Musselman v. ManlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ross v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Farris v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Reynolds v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API