Steil v. Humana Kansas City, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order (doc. 75). Defendant moves for a protective order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(1). It seeks to prevent plaintiff from taking depositions as requested by his Rule 30(b)(6) Notice. Defendant contends the notice does not identify a subject matter for examination with “reasonable particularity.” Defendant argues that plaintiffs requests cause annoyance, oppression, undue burden and expense by seeking examination on matters irrelevant to any legal or factual issue designated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reed v. BennettDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
3Cited by16 opinions
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. Lear Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Moses v. HalsteadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Transcor, Inc. v. Furney Charters, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Kannaday v. BallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Kirk's Tire & Auto Servicenter of Haverstraw, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.