People v. Simac
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
Defense attorney David Sotomayor (contemnor) appeals the judgment of direct criminal contempt entered against him at the conclusion of the trial of defendant, Christopher Simac. On appeal, the contemnor argues that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of contempt; and (2) the grounds stated in the order of contempt are conclusory and unsupported by the record.
Defendant was charged with driving while his license was revoked and with failing to yield while making a left turn. At his bench trial on December 11, 1990, the court directed all witnesses who were going to testify to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. BeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kemner v. Monsanto Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. RayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. SimacIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Kiner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re Marriage of LichtensteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- People v. GriffithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.