People v. Simac
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bilandic
The sole issue in this appeal is whether appellant, David Sotomayor, an attorney licensed to practice law in this State, was properly found in direct criminal contempt of court. During a traffic proceeding in Du Page County, appellant substituted an individual other than defendant at counsel’s table, without the court’s permission or knowledge. The trial judge found that such conduct constituted direct criminal contempt, and fined appellant $500. The appellate court, with one justice dissenting, affirmed the finding of direct criminal contempt, but reduced the fine to $100. (236 Ill. App. 3d…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People v. TyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. JavarasIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. LoughranIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Kunce v. HoganIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- People v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Kaeding v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Kiner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. BudzynskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Johnson v. Compost Products, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.