In Re Commercial Explosives Litigation
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM, District Judge.
The defendant E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) filed a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim of conspiracy under § 1 of the Sherman Act and for failure to plead with particularity that the four-year limitation on such a claim was tolled by fraudulent concealment. For reasons discussed below, the motion is denied.
I. Background
In their Consolidated Amended Complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants engaged in a nationwide conspiracy to fix prices of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.