Legal Opinion

In Re Commercial Explosives Litigation

District Court, D. Utah

Decided October 25, 1996No. 2:96-cv-01093Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SAM, District Judge.

The defendant E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) filed a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim of conspiracy under § 1 of the Sherman Act and for failure to plead with particularity that the four-year limitation on such a claim was tolled by fraudulent concealment. For reasons discussed below, the motion is denied.

I. Background

In their Consolidated Amended Complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants engaged in a nationwide conspiracy to fix prices of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API