Legal Opinion

State v. McManus

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1902No. 13,243PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Kingman district court; P. B. Gillett, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J. :

McManus was informed against for selling intoxicating liquors and for keeping a place where such liquors were kept for sale and sold, and *721where persons were permitted to resort for the purpose of drinking intoxicating liquors as a beverage. A warrant was issued for his arrest, which authorized the officer to whom it was directed and delivered to seize and take into his possession “all intoxicating liquors, glasses, bottles, kegs, pumps, bars and other property used and kept in maintaining said place.” Notice was issued by the clerk of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Origet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. State v. Brennan's LiquorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  3. Hine v. BeldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  4. Sullivan v. City of OneidaIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Hibbard v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keeter v. State Ex Rel. Saye, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. People v. De La MaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Utah Liquor Control Commission v. WoorasUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. One 1978 Chevrolet Corvette Vin 1Z87L8S437138Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API