Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Tytanic
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 17, 2002No. 96,818, 96,817Published
1Opinion of the Court
61 P.3d 249 (2002)
2002 OK 100
In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Michael Dennis TYTANIC, Deceased.
Joseph Charles Tytanic, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Phillip James Tytanic, Respondent-Appellee.
Nos. 96,818, 96,817.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
December 17, 2002.
Charles L. Fagin, Fagin, Fagin & Nixon, Oklahoma City, for Appellant.
J. Michael Entz, Law Offices of J. Michael Entz, Oklahoma City, and James L. Menzer, Menzer Law Offices, P.C., Blackwell, for Appellee.
OPINION
WATT, Vice Chief Justice.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 1 The decedent, Michael Dennis Tytanic, was involved in a common law relationship…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Hedges v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Hughey v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Matter of Estate of FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Hooper v. ClinkingbeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.