Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Walls

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1996No. COA95-423PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff first argues that the trial court erred in granting defendant Buncombe County DSS’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We agree and remand to the Superior Court because we conclude that the trial court erred in failing to make additional findings necessary to determine in what forum jurisdiction properly lies.

“[A] subordinate division of the state, or agency exercising statutory governmental functions . . . , may be sued only when and as authorized by statute.” Coleman v. Cooper, 102 N.C. App. 650, 658, 403 S.E.2d 577,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Hare v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Clark v. ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Austin v. Continental General TireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Wood v. North Carolina State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Velez v. Dick Keffer Pontiac GMC Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API