Legal Opinion

Noerr v. Schmidt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1898No. 18,325PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee Schmidt, as trustee, brought this action against his co-appellees and appellant to foreclose a mortgage executed by appellant’s intestate in his lifetime. Appellant’s demurrer to the complaint was overruled. Appellees George and Frederick Noerr filed a counterclaim, by which they sought to be subrogated to the rights of the mortgagee under a prior mortgage on the same real estate, and to foreclose the same. The court found in favor of Schmidt, trustee, and in favor of George and Frederick Noerr upon their counterclaim, and over appellant’s motion for a new trial, rendered judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bass Foundry v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Kinnaman v. KinnamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Browning v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Chapell v. ShueeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Jackman Cigar Manufacturing Co. v. John Berger & Son Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Leibold v. LeiboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Indiana Suburban Sewers, Inc. v. HansonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Hatfield v. RookerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API