Legal Opinion

Gershman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1962No. Appeal, No. 326PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is an interpleader action wherein plaintiff-appellants, Lois and Michael Gershman, represented by their mother, Rhoda Gershman (first wife of the deceased, Benjamin Gershman) seek to obtain the proceeds of certain insurance policies on the life of Benjamin Gershman as against Benjamin’s second wife, Dorothy, the named beneficiary. Appellants claim the funds by virtue of an agreement between Rhoda and Benjamin made just two days before the scheduled master’s hearing concerning Benjamin’s divorce from Rhoda. By that agreement, Benjamin acceded to Rhoda’s request…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hundertmark v. HundertmarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Schmoker v. SchmokerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BarnessDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Mullen v. SuchkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Lurie v. LurieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. InterDigital Communications, Corp. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API