Legal Opinion
Hundertmark v. Hundertmark
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 1952No. Appeal, 190PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
This suit in the nature of a bill of interpleader was instituted by the former wife of a decedent against his widow and an insurance company to determine which of the personal litigants was entitled to the proceeds of a certificate of insurance issued by the company on the life of the decedent. The insurance company paid the face value of the policy into the registry of the court and the case was proceeded with to final decree on stipulated facts.
Jane and Paul Hundertmark were married on June 1, 1925. During their marriage the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- King v. Supreme Council Catholic Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Shay v. Merchants Banking Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Supreme Lodge, Knights & Ladies of Honor v. UlanowskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. MessierDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Reeves v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Foster v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.