Legal Opinion

Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. Hawaii State Legislature

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2010No. 30535Published

1Opinion of the Court

LAW LIBRAHY NO. 30535 lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAlT OFFlCE OF HAWAllAN AFFAlRS, Petitioner, VS. HAWAll STATE LEGlSLATURE, ReSpOndent. gV7hd ORlGlNAL PROCEEDlNG QYEB (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Recktenwald, JJ. and Circuit Judge Border, in place of Duffy, J., recused) Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by petitioner Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the papers in support, and respondent’s answer, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawafi 200, 204,

982 P.2d 334,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kema v. GaddisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Salling v. MoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API