Legal Opinion

Dean v. Rutherford

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 13, 1977No. 13901PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

Plaintiff Fred Dean, d/b/a Dean Mansonry, brought suit against defendants James S. Rutherford and Dorothy Rutherford seeking to foreclose a mechanics’ lien against defendants’ residence premises for work done in the construction of three brick and masonry fireplaces, the repair of a fourth fireplace and the partial enclosure of the range and stove area in the kitchen. Defendants counterclaimed alleging in count I that plaintiff failed to fulfill his contract because he did not perform the masonry construction in a workmanlike manner and alleging in count II that plaintiff breached an express…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Economy Fuse & Mfg. Co. v. Raymond Concrete Pile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Quitman v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Stanley J. Gottschalk Construction Co. v. CarlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  5. Springdale Cemetery Ass'n v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Bloomfield Club Recreation Ass'n v. Hoffman Group Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Altevogt v. BrinkoetterIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Zielinski v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Vicorp Restaurants v. Corinco Insulating Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Downes Swimming Pool, Inc. v. North Shore National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API