Legal Opinion
City of Akron v. Holland Oil Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 14, 2002No. C.A. No. 20954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Whitmore, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Holland Oil Co. (“Holland”) has appealed from a judgment of the Akron Municipal Court finding it guilty of one count of the sale of alcohol to an underage person. This court reverses.
I
{¶ 2} Acting in cooperation with an underage informant, Akron police officers conducted a “controlled buy” of alcohol at the Holland station located at 924 East Exchange Street. Soon thereafter, Akron police returned to the Holland station to issue summonses to Mr. Mitchell, the cashier working at Holland who sold the informant the alcohol, and to the business. Each was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Martin v. Central Ohio Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of Akron v. Holland Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Davey Tree ExpertOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Masek v. Marroulis, 2007-T-0034 (11-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Chad M. Leonard Holdings, Inc. v. RohaleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- City of Akron v. Holland Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004