Legal Opinion

City of Akron v. Holland Oil Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2004No. 2002-1678Published

1DissentPfeifer, J.

{¶ 2} This case should be decided on the merits.

{¶ 3} On December 18, 2000, an underage informant of the Akron Police Department conducted a controlled buy of alcohol at a store operated by appellee, Holland Oil Company (“Holland”), located at 924 Exchange Street in Akron. The 19-year-old informant drove a minivan through the drive-through while an officer remained hidden in the rear of the van. The informant told the clerk that she wanted to purchase a six-pack of beer. She stated that she was 22 years old and, when asked, stated her date of birth. The clerk accepted payment for the beer,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Osborne v. LylesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Amstutz v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Wiebold Studio, Inc. v. Old World Restorations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Tarlecka v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API