Legal Opinion

Mary Helen Coal Corp. v. Hudson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2000No. 99-2181PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge MOTZ joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a concurring opinion.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

This case arises in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498, 118 S.Ct. 2131, 141 L.Ed.2d 451 (1998). In Eastern, the Court held that Coal Act premiums assessed against companies such as Mary Helen Coal violated the Fifth Amendment. Although the defendants returned the unconstitutionally collected premiums, they refused to compensate Mary Helen…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ward v. Dixie National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. G ex rel. SSGT RG v. Fort Bragg Dependent SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. G ex rel. Ssgt Rg v. Fort Bragg Dependent SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. Brown v. Astro Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. New Jersey Carpenters Pension Fund v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment AgencyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API