In Re the Welfare of J.J.T.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant juvenile J.J.T. was adjudicated delinquent for a federal offense involving theft of mail. He claims the district court should have voided its adjudication of his delinquency because the court lacked jurisdiction to decide the federal offense and because the case was not properly referred to the district court. Because state courts lack jurisdiction to decide juvenile cases where the underlying charge is solely a violation of federal law, we reverse.
FACTS
On the morning of December 21, 1995, J.J.T., then 14 years old, and his 16-year-old brother, J.T., left…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Gutierrez v. City of WenatcheeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Jose C.California Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Jose C.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re the Welfare of J.J.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997