Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of J.J.T.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 11, 1997No. C8-96-1279Published
1Opinion of the Court
559 N.W.2d 714 (1997)
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF J.J.T.
No. C8-96-1279.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
March 11, 1997.
Paul C. Thissen, Special Assistant State Public Defender, Briggs and Morgan, John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Charlann E. Winking, Assistant Public Defender, Minneapolis, for Appellant J.J.T.
Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General, St. Paul, for Respondent State of Minnesota.
Roger S. Van Heel, Stearns County Attorney, William S. MacPhail, Assistant County Attorney, St. Cloud, for Respondent State of Minnesota.
Considered and decided by AMUNDSON, P.J., SCHUMACHER and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Gutierrez v. City of WenatcheeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1987
- In Re the Welfare of J.J.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997