Legal Opinion

Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

We granted allowance of appeal in this consolidated case to consider whether a plaintiff may recover delay damages on the full amount of a jury verdict in his favor, or whether delay damages are limited to the amount of the legally-recoverable molded verdict, as it was adjusted by the court to reflect insurance policy limits. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a plaintiff may recover delay damages only on the amount of legally-recoverable damages to which he is entitled pursuant to the molded verdict. Thus, we remand this matter to the Superior Court for remand to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Anchorstar v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Woods v. Commonwealth Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Allen v. MellingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. LaRue v. McGuireSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grossi v. Travelers Personal Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Barrick v. Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian CharitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Koch, B. v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Constantine, K. v. Lenox Instr. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. BAUM v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API