Legal Opinion

LaRue v. McGuire

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 In this case of first impression, we are asked to decide the interplay between two Rules of Civil Procedure: Rule 238, relating to damages for delay; and Rule 1311.1, allowing parties to stipulate to a limit of $15,000 in damages. We vacate the judgment and remand for computation of delay damages.1

¶2 The facts of this case are not in dispute in this appeal. Appellant (“lessee”) claimed that on March 4, 2000, he tripped over a loose piece of carpet and fell while carrying his computer during the process of moving out of his apartment. As a result, lessee filed an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Colodonato v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Woods v. Commonwealth Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Jones v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Allen v. MellingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Lyles v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re K.T.E.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Kopytin v. AschingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Thompson v. T.J. Whipple Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Bargo v. KuhnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Grimm v. Universal Medical Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API