Legal Opinion

Stephen Peabody, Jr., & Co. v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, J.:

Before answering, defendant applied for an order striking out the matter contained in numerous paragraphs of the complaint as violative of section 241 of the Civil Practice Act, and for an order requiring plaintiff to set up as separate causes of action matters contained in various parts of the complaint. The order was granted to the extent of requiring plaintiff to separately state and number, as a separate cause of action, its allegations contained in six paragraphs of the complaint, and it was denied in all other respects. Both plaintiff and defendant appeal.

Plaintiff contends…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Stephen Peabody, Jr., & Co. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Inman v. Credit Discount Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Bob v. HecksherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. J. Pratt Carroll, Inc. v. Murphy Fruit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API