Legal Opinion
Stephen Peabody, Jr., & Co. v. Travelers Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1925PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
The plaintiff, a domestic corporation engaged in the insurance brokerage business, commenced an action against the defendant, a Connecticut corporation authorized to do business in the State of New York, which its attorney has been- pleased to call an action analogous to interfering with trade or calling. On a previous appeal from a motion to strike out portions of the complaint the Appellate Division (206 App. Div. 206) required the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint separating its causes of action. It is the amended complaint which is before us. The Special Term denied the defendant’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- S. C. Posner Co. v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Stephen Peabody, Jr., & Co. v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by18 opinions
- Reinforce, Inc. v. BirneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- National Convention Services, L.L.C. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Albina Marine Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Employees' Liability Assurance Corp. of London v. Hayes Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- American Motorists Insurance v. New York Seven-Up Bottling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.