Legal Opinion
Lasure v. McDonough
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided December 20, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00190Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 TOMEKA DAWN LASURE, NO. 2:22-CV-0190-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, Secretary, United States Department 11 of Veterans Affairs, 12 Defendant. 13 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint. ECF 14 No. 4. This matter was submitted for consideration without oral argument. The 15 Court has reviewed the record and files herein, and is fully informed. For the 16 reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF No. 4) 17 is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,272, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5268, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8535 in Re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation. Timothy J. Anderson Neil Singer Arthur Singer, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Gary W. Clow Douglas Whiting Robert Johnson Alex Brown & Sons Incorporated Lawrence FinchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.