Legal Opinion

Sixth Lenox Terrace Associates v. Schneider

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided September 25, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ruben A. Martino, J.

In this holdover proceeding based on respondent’s failure to renew a rent-stabilized lease, respondent moves for summary judgment, attorneys’ fees and for such other and further relief as is appropriate. Petitioner opposes. Based on the notice of motion and affirmation in opposition, the court grants summary judgment in favor of respondent but denies the request for legal fees.

Respondent moved into the subject premises on September 23, 2005 pursuant to a two-year nonregulated market lease at $1,440 per month. Petitioner was and still is receiving a J-51 *798…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. 72A Realty Associates v. LucasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API