Schnadig Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the infringer of a design patent can use the income taxes and fixed expenses attributable to his infringing activities to reduce the amount of his “total profit” from the infringement which a design patentee can recover under 35 U.S.C. § 289 (1976).
I. FACTS
Plaintiff Schnadig obtained a design patent on a three piece Spanish motif sectional sofa suite. In Schnadig Corp. v. Gaines Mfg. Co., 494 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1974), this court affirmed the district court’s findings that Schnadig’s patent was valid and infringed by Gaines’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hort v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Raytheon Production Corp. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Three Boys Music Corp. v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. And Hawe Yue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Norris Industries, Inc. v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation and David L. Ladd, Register of CopyrightsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- In Design v. K-Mart Apparel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- USM Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.