Legal Opinion
Joelson v. O'KEEFE
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 18, 1999No. C7-98-1973, C5-98-2121, C9-98-1974, C3-98-2246, C3-98-2120PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
The appellants, all of whom have been committed indeterminately as psycho*907pathic personalities, brought individual petitions for writs of habeas corpus to challenge the constitutionality of their commitments. The district courts denied the petitions and these appeals followed, which we consolidated because they raise similar legal issues. Respondent’s motion to strike portions of the appendices of two appellants (for including materials not part of the trial court record) was unopposed. We affirm and grant in part and deny in part respondent’s motion.
FACTS
Joelson v.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beaulieu v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Maiers v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rodrick Dean Pouncy, JrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Joelson v. O'KEEFECourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Ward v. GandhiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025