Wunder v. Turner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to compel defendant to assign to plaintiff an undivided ½ interest in the letters patent of the United States, No. 589,585, and in the pending application for letters patent in the U. S. No. 378,444, filed June 11, 1907; an undivided -J interest in said letters patent upon the same invention issued to defendant in Great Britain, Canada and Mexico; and to account for % of all profits and royalties obtained and received by him…
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to compel defendant to assign to plaintiff an undivided ½ interest in the letters patent of the United States, No. 589,585, and in the pending application for letters patent in the U. S. No. 378,444, filed June 11, 1907; an undivided -J interest in said letters patent upon the same invention issued to defendant in Great Britain, Canada and Mexico; and to account for % of all profits and royalties obtained and received by him from the use of the invention in the United States, Great Britain, Canada and Mexico. The case was tried before John Day…
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action in equity brought by the plaintiff in the district court of the county of Hennepin to enforce the specific performance *14of an alleged oral contract, with reference to an invention useful in connection with reinforced concrete construction, and patents to be obtained covering such invention. The complaint alleged the making of the oral contract, and that it was thereby agreed that the defendant should invent and devise a method of construction which would provide a reinforced concrete structure having flat slab floors, thereby dispensing with the use of girders or beams, for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carver v. BagleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Philips v. MoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Butler v. BohnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Cornish, Curtis & Greene Co. v. Antrim Co-operative Dairy Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sommers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Bicanic v. J. C. Campbell Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Flynn v. BeiselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Woodville v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Freeburg v. HonemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.