Legal Opinion

Galveston, Harrisbubg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Ryon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1888No. 2353PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Fort Bend. Tried below before the Hon. W H. Burkhart.

1Opinion of the Court

Maltbie, Presiding Judge.

The courts hold, almost without dissent, that a person guilty of negligence contributory to his injury, may recover, notwithstanding his own negligence, if the defendant, after discovering plaintiff’s danger, fails to use ordinary care to avoid injuring him. But in general, where the defendant owes the plaintiff no duty, and is not aware of his danger, though the discovery might have been made by the exercise of ordinary prudence on the part of defendant, no recovery can be had. In the Symkins case, 54 Texas, 615, it was held that if, after Symkins went on the track…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. SympkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. RyonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. St. Louis & Texas Railway Co. v. CrosnoeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Artusy v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API