St. Louis & Texas Railway Co. v. Crosnoe
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Smith. Tried below before. Hon. Felix J. McCord.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Crosnoe for personal injuries inflicted upon him May 23d, 1887, at Corsicana, Texas, by a moving car on the railway track of defendant-running upon plaintiff while he was crossing the track at a public highway. The defendant answered that the “defendant company had a yard upon which ivas constructed sidings and switches for the exclusive purpose of switching cars from the main track, changing cars, and making up trains; that this yard is located at a point where its sidings and switches do not intersect or cross any…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Galveston City Railroad v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- The Steamboat Clipper v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1849
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. BoozerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Farris v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Cahill v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
- Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. LonginoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.