Legal Opinion

St. Louis & Texas Railway Co. v. Crosnoe

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1888No. 2603PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Smith. Tried below before. Hon. Felix J. McCord.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Crosnoe for personal injuries inflicted upon him May 23d, 1887, at Corsicana, Texas, by a moving car on the railway track of defendant-running upon plaintiff while he was crossing the track at a public highway. The defendant answered that the “defendant company had a yard upon which ivas constructed sidings and switches for the exclusive purpose of switching cars from the main track, changing cars, and making up trains; that this yard is located at a point where its sidings and switches do not intersect or cross any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Galveston City Railroad v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. The Steamboat Clipper v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. BoozerTexas Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Farris v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Cahill v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  5. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. LonginoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API