Legal Opinion

Young v. Sorenson Hooper

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Aransas County Court; F. Stevens, Judge. Action by Sorenson & Hooper against S. P. Young. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

Appellees sued appellant on October 20, 1911, in justice’s court of precinct No. 1 of Aransas county for $134.28 due on account. November 27, 1911, appellant filed his written answer containing demurrer and special exceptions. November 27, 1911, plaintiffs filed their account, itemized, the items dated from January 1 to April 13, 1909, aggregating $134.2S, and an item of 15 cents being dated March 17, 1910. Defendant filed demurrer, general denial, and specially pleaded the statutes of limitation of two years as to all items except the 15 cents, which he admitted owing. He also orally pleaded…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nunn v. EdmistonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Simpson v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Titus v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. Forbach v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. TitusDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API