Legal Opinion

Garcia Maytin v. Vela

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 21, 1910No. Nos. 90 and 245PublishedCited by 18 opinions

AI’I’BALR FROM TIIIC SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. The facts arc stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

These are.cross-appeals in a proceeding brought by Monser-rate and Dominga Garcia, two sisters of Manuel Garcia ■ Maytin, and by another plaintiff now dropped out, to establish their rights in property descended from the said Manuel Garcia. The claim is founded upon Article 811 of the former Civil Code,' of which the following is the War Department translation: “The ascendant who inherits property from his descendant, acquired by the latter for a good consideration from another descendant [ascendant] or from a brother or sister, is obliged to reserve the property he may have acquired by force…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardee v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Armijo v. ArmijoSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. De Castro v. Board of Comm'rs of San JuanSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. City of Shidler v. H. C. Speer & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API