Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 14, 1918No. 8 Div. 103PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; R. C. Brickell, Judge. Action by R. N. Harris, Jr., and others, against the Southern Railway Company. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

The appellees instituted Ibis action of trover for the conversion by the appellant carrier of 25 bales of cotton consigned by Jordan" and. Moss, at Guntersville, Ala., to themselves at Decatur, Ala., “order notify” the appellees, who were dealers in cotton at Decatur. The bill of lading was issued by the N. C. & St. L. R. R. Co. The route contemplated, and that used to transport the cotton, was over the N. C. & St. L. Ry. to Huntsville, Ala., and thence to Decatur over the appellant’s line. The shipment was intrastate, not interstate; hence the laws applicable to define the rights and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Bolling v. Kirby & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Furman v. . Union Pacific R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pollard v. PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Birmingham Water Works Co. v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Davis v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. W. F. Covington Mfg. Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Davis v. ZimmernSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API