Legal Opinion

United States v. Brian Hoyt, AKA Brian Doyle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1989No. 87-1224PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Footnote 1 on 879 F.2d 505, 506 (9th Cir.1989) should be deleted. The remaining footnotes should be renumbered.

At the end of section VII, 879 F.2d, at 514, the following text should be inserted before the section titled “Conclusion:”

VIII. Special Assessment Penalty

This circuit has held that 18 U.S.C. Section 3013 (Supp. II 1984), the special assessment statute under which Hoyt was fined, is unconstitutional as a violation of the Origination Clause of the Constitution. U.S. Const. art. I, Section 7. United States v. Munoz-Flores, 863 F.2d 654, 661 (9th Cir.1988), cert. granted, — U.S. -,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ramee Jamal Shah, Aka: Eddie Harris, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Preservation Coalition, Inc. v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. German Munoz-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Brian Hoyt, AKA Brian DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Erickson Meko CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  3. United States v. Reginald Sinclair BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Mark William Paul StauferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Curtis Fitzgerald HardingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API