Legal Opinion
United States v. German Munoz-Flores
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 12, 1988No. 86-5236PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal of the denial of a motion to set aside a sentence imposing two twenty-five dollar special assessments for immigration law violations, German Munoz-Flores (“Munoz”) contends that passage of the Special Assessment on Convicted Persons (18 U.S.C. § 3013 (1984)) did not comply with the requirements of the origination clause of the Constitution.
We find that the constitutionality of the Special Assessment on Convicted Persons is squarely presented in this appeal. An analysis of the legislative history of the statute persuades us that the enactment of the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Ramee Jamal Shah, Aka: Eddie Harris, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Maria Velarde AnguianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Maria Yanibe MontillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. David Keith BelgardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jesus Castro-CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.