Legal Opinion

Seiple v. Progressive Northern Ins.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 13-1826PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Alfred Seiple brings suit against Defendant Progressive Northern Insurance Company (“Progressive”) on his own behalf and on behalf of a purported class, claiming that Progressive wrongfully denied him stacked uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits. Although he explicitly waived stacked coverage — and paid accordingly reduced premiums — when he originally bought his motorcycle insurance policy, Sieple claims that Progressive was required to provide him with a new opportunity to waive stacked benefits each time he added a new motorcycle to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kathleen Buck v. The Hampton Township School District Lawrence C. Korchnak, DrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. Pro Design, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Sackett v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brandi Fipps v. Progressive Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2022
  2. LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEBRUNDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEBRUNDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. WHITE v. BUSHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API