Legal Opinion
McNaughton v. Dillingham Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1984No. 82-3211PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYLE, District Judge.
In McNaughton v. Dillingham Corporation, et al., 707 F.2d 1042 (9th Cir.1983), we upheld the application of Oregon’s twenty-day limitation period for filing exceptions to arbitration awards, Or.Rev.Stat. § 33.310 (1981), to bar plaintiff’s claim against his employer, Dillingham Corporation, brought under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185. We further found this was not to be an appropriate case to address Dillingham’s suggestion that the court apply the six-month limitation period under Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Donald Singer v. The Flying Tiger Line Inc., and Air Line Pilots Association, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Acri v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States of America, and Quinalt Indian Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Wholesale & Retail Food Distribution Local 63 v. Santa Fe Terminal Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1993
- George T. Acri v. International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Scoggins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.