Legal Opinion
In re Toyota Motor Corp. Hybrid Brake Marketing
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 30, 2013No. Case No. CV 10-00946-CJC(RNBx); MDL No. SAML 10-02172-CJC(RNBx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff David Gelber brings this putative class action against Defendants Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. (together, “Toyota”) on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, who purchased or leased a model year 2004-2009 Toyota Prius (“Gen II Prius”) vehicle in California. Mr. Gelber alleges that Gen II Prius vehicles have a defective anti-lock braking system (“ABS”) resulting in unsafe extended stopping distances. Specifically, he alleges that because of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Birdsong v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018