Legal Opinion

State v. Hagan

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1929No. 5212PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on conviction of violation of C. S., sec. 8438, which provides:

“Every person who, for his own gain, or to prevent the owner from again possessing his property, buys or receives any personal property, knowing the same to have been stolen, is punishable.....”

The defendant, having by demurrer and otherwise in the trial contended that the information charges more than one offense, assigns as error adverse rulings thereon. The material portion of the information alleged the larceny of the property involved, and that thereafter “the defendant . . . . did ....…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
  2. Gray v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Driskill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  4. State v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. ChismMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. OldhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Ritter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  5. State v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API